MU Talk

Vanessa 18:02 on 19/01/2014 Permalink Reply
Tags: Collective ( 2 ), LACMA ( 2 ), PBR ( 8 ), RFP ( 2 ), Stanford ( 5 )   

• 

  Christa Forster 20:12 on 19/01/2014 Permalink | Reply

  Van, I’m interested. Here are the bullet points that I feel most resonate with “us”:

  Connection and explorations of portable identities and pseudo-identities
  • Distributed experience and storytelling through multi-dimensional user
  experience design
  • Crowd-sourced information production and human-based computation
  knowledge

  And here are the questions that I think “we” can best answer.

  Is the project artist-led and does it have artistic merit? YES
  • Does it produce an interactive experience that can be presented in the
  public space of the museum (which may include virtual/online space)? YES
  • Does the project suggest models, methods, and/or data that may be of
  interest to other artists and technologists? YES
  • Does the process proposed by the artist include opportunities to present
  demos, prototypes or collaborative opportunities for the public during the
  development period? YES

  The directions are pretty straight forward. With whoever is interested, we can split up the sections and answer them, or we — whoever is interested — could each write responses, and then we could massage the responses into a single app.

  Hello! LOIS WEAVER–> 🙂